Simply put, he would … She was dead, of course. The insanity defense acts … There is, however, another and more important reason for a change in our system. Criminal liability in these instances is unfair. It could mean that the accused would just be housed at a professional mental health treatment center. If the jury does not agree, the defendant will be convicted, and generally will serve a longer sentence than will someone convicted of the same crime who has not pleaded insanity. 5. In case you did not know, insanity defense is a type of defense where the person who is charged with an offense would admit that he committed a crime, but would claim that he is not responsible for it due to mental illness. Insanity is an excuse for criminal liability only when it seriously damages the person’s capacity to act and/or reason and to understand. Many times people can get away Mental illness can be taken into consideration at the time of sentencing. People perceive serial killers as inhumane and question how they could ever commit the crimes that they do. Simply put, he would be found not guilty by reason of being insane. To have a good idea about it on our end, let us take a look at its pros and cons. & Health 113 (1985-1987) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at EngagedScholarship@CSU. Surely, you must have read about or either recalls the story where former US President Ronald Reagan got shot back in the 1980s, right? Vaknin is … The insanity defense has long been recognized as a legal defense to the commission of a crime. Montana: The state has abolished the insanity defense, although a guilty but insane verdict is allowed. It is likely that such stay will be more taxing for the accused, and there is always a chance to get cured and then sentenced as a sane and normal person. Many times people can get away Also, it might happen that, despite being proven insane, an accused person may still be proven guilty and given an adequate sentence as per the law, even death. The Insanity Defense: A person who is insane is not in control of their own thoughts or their own actions. Her car was missing. The basic pre-condition for punishment is that the person who committed the criminal behavior must have responsibility as a moral agent. Terms of Use, Law Library - American Law and Legal Information, Insanity Defense - History, Colin Ferguson, Is There A Need For The Insanity Defense?, Consequences, Defendants' Rights. Andrea Yates and John Hinckley were two famous exceptions. The burden of proof is on the defendant. Juries find for only about 20 percent of the defendants who plead insanity. The proposal behind the defense is people who are insane cannot have the knowledge required to perform a criminal act because they either do not know that act is wrong or cannot control their actions even when they understand the act is wrong, but this theory is controversial because insanity is difficult to define, and the circumstances in which insanity can be used to excuse criminal responsibility are … The Insanity Defense. Its an unequal form of justice ! They range from assault to shoplifting. In fact, being relieved from a jail sentence even if an accused had to stay in a psychiatric facility is not always a good thing. in practice in England insanity is never interposed as a defense except in capital cases. She had been gagged, there was electrical cord around her neck and her hands were bound behind her back with electrical wire. Richard Bonnie, a Professor of law and psychiatry, leans on yes -- insanity should indeed exist as a legal defense for criminals. This theory should be abolished or altered. Furthermore, such opponents of the insanity plea claim that the criminal court process has been corrupted by the ease with which an insanity plea can be made. In most societies, insane people are allowed special consideration in criminal proceedings. and its Licensors Insanity defense is one topic that is often argued much about because of its moral concern. 5. Activity InstructionsFor this assignment, you will right an op-ed article for a newspaper in your state. Legislators and the public generally question the need for the defense after a defendant in a highly publicized murder case is found not guilty by reason of insanity. The insanity defense should only be allowed to be used if a person is suffering a mental illness and every criminal who is recognized with having medical mental health problems should . Fersh, the author of “Thinking of the Insanity Defense” stated in his book that, “ The American Psychological Association is primarily interested in providing empirical research to serve as a basis for informed public decisions, assisting the judge and jury in making legal, scientific and moral determinations, and ensuring appropriate treatment for mentally impaired offenders. The state uses the M'Naghten Rule. In some cases, people who are accused of crimes can avoid being imprisoned if proven insane. It is abolished in some jurisdictions. It is likely that the defense will hire specialists to evaluate the defendant in order to determine the level of existing mental illness. It allows the judge to determine the length of imprisonment, which occurs in a hospital prison, and shifts the burden to the defendant to prove he is no longer dangerous or mentally ill in order to be released. 4. Simply by the virtue of insanity, a person can get some respite from the court. Nebraska In case you did not know, insanity defense is a type of defense where the person who is charged with an offense would admit that he committed a crime, but would claim that he is not responsible for it due to mental illness. However, it is not guaranteed that an accused would be entirely acquitted. The insanity defense should only be allowed to be used if a person is suffering a mental illness and every criminal who is recognized with having medical mental health problems should . The insanity defense operates from the idea that people who are not mentally capable of knowing right from wrong, or who are unable to control their acts by reason of mental illness should not be held responsible for the wrongs they commit. It should be noted, however, that in the criminal law "insane" is often very different definition in the courts than the medical definition of "mentally ill" … It can lead to increased trial costs. At present, the defense of insanity is a trap for the insane, and a way of escape for the sane. Based on this argument, proponents of the insanity defense do not support its application to a person who willingly consumes a powerful hallucinogen and then commits a criminal act. Though it might not be jail, still it gets him off the streets. Persons represented by public defenders are usually afforded a psychiatric examination for the defense, but they may not get the same quality of exam, nor are they typically able to hire more than one examiner. 2. It can lead to rejection. Those who wish to retain it note that forty-eight of the fifty states have some type of insanity defense. The burden of proof is on the state. If a person commits a criminal act, that person should be convicted. Opponents to the abolition of the insanity plea contend that attempting to remove the possibility of an insanity plea from the criminal court process would not only be difficult, it would likely also be met with opposition on grounds of being unconstitutional. The two issues together create a legal insanity defense that may not be justifiable. More generally, Bonnie has said that the insanity defense is central to our “beliefs about human rationality, deterrability, and free will.” The U.S. courts have held in State v. Curry that the insanity defense “goes to the very root of our criminal justice system.” Perlin believes that the insanity defense undermines the fair trial rights and due process concerns of defendants with mental illnesses and that … Defend why the criminal defense of insanity should or should not be allowed as a criminal defense! Defendant’s mother had an active order of protection out against Defendant. 3. This defense is not a guarantee that the defendant will be set free. 2. What does this mean? One huge advantage of insanity defense is that the accused could avoid penalized with death, even if he were proven guilty. Take James Holmes, for instance. Legal and medical commentators have divided opinions about the need for the insanity defense. There are as many mass murderers who were not executed as there are those who were! It can lead to a no-jail term or possible acquittal. For the prosecuting team, they will also want to be involved in the process of specialist selection. First and foremost, Rowe believes that the only solution to questions surrounding the insanity defense is the complete abolition of its existence. The public is given a distorted view of who uses the defense and how it is employed. However, based on the pros and cons listed above, do you think insanity defense is really good for the society, or not? Because of abuse of insanity defense in the past, judges, juries and prosecutors, these days, have become more cautious. The insanity defense acts as a not guilty defense to most crimes. These two reasons are the primary bases why insanity pleas are used in cases where they are applicable. However, being found not guilty because of insanity means that a capital punishment is out of the question. Jonathan Rowe examines its credibleness and makes several valid points as to why the insanity defence should be abolished. Some have abolished it, so a case might need to be transferred, which is quite unlikely unless a very convincing reason is there, to a jurisdiction that uses such a provision. The Insanity Defense. Often, it is perceived that insanity pleas are a clever ploy. The insanity defense is raised in less than 1% of felony cases, and it's only successful in a fraction of those. Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationFree Legal Encyclopedia: Indirect evidence to Internal Revenue CodeInsanity Defense - History, Colin Ferguson, Is There A Need For The Insanity Defense?, Consequences, Defendants' Rights, Copyright © 2020 Web Solutions LLC. That defendant must assert that he/she is not aware of the actions. When defendants’ mental illnesses prevent them from understanding the wrongfulness of the act or prevent them from controlling their behavior, they should be acquitted by reason of insanity. Unlike the "American Sniper" case, the plea for insanity was accepted. It would be unfair to punish a person in such an extreme condition. While there's a desire to shield the mentally ill from the full brunt of the legal system, there are also concerns about false claims of mental illness used to manipulate the criminal justice system. So, every time it is put forth, it would ring alarm bells, where every person involved would become overly conscious of all arguments in favor or against the defense party. The insanity defense asserts that the criminal defendant is not guilty by reason of insanity. Most states have at least one version of an insanity defense available for defendants to … Even so, it would be eventually up to the judge or the jury to accept or reject insanity defense. Activity InstructionsFor this assignment, you will right an op-ed article for a newspaper in your state. Also, it is recorded that only 25% of insanity defenses were successful, and they only account for about 1% of the total cases that are handled by the justice system each year. Defend why the criminal defense of insanity should or should not be allowed as a criminal defense! Both sides agree that the word insane is a legal, not medical, term. Another major argument against the insanity defense challenges its supposed moral basis. Finally, critics argue that the insanity plea is a rich person's defense. Due to the fact that many societies do not want to give punishments to people who do not genuinely know what is right from wrong, the trial’s evaluation would becomes more about an individual’s state of mind, rather than the actual case facts where harm was caused. Apart from combating these myths, advocates of the insanity defense contend that a fundamental principle of CRIMINAL LAW is at stake. Because a two-tiered criminal justice system is morally repugnant, critics contend that the insanity defense must be abolished. It is only attempted in 1% of all murder charges, and it is rarely successful. While “[n]o rule of law can be reliable Rowe first addresses the thought of alleged forensic head-shrinkers. In fact about one percent of criminal defendants invoke the defense. Finally, the fact that most highly publicized cases involve murder disguises the true demographics: 60 to 70 percent of insanity pleas are for crimes other than murder. So, rather than trying to dispute the facts, the goal is to find the defendant as being innocent because his mental state. Some opponents attack the insanity defense for confusing psychiatric and legal concepts, in the process undermining the moral integrity of the law. 1. Put in mind that a capital crime carries a punishment of eventual death. Though the chance of acquittal has become slimmer over the years, it is still possible that a person might get some reprieve. Why do we need an insanity defense? Majority of people are found capable of standing trial, even if they attempt to push for an insanity plea. Jonathan Rowe examines its credibility and makes several valid points as to why the insanity defense should be abolished. 4. Without previous mental record, the jurisdiction will not believe the defense that easy. First and first, Rowe believes that the lone solution to inquiries environing the insanity defence is the complete abolishment of its being. Criminal defendants who use the insanity defense are said to be pleading "not guilty by reason of insanity" (NGRI). And even if the defense is used, it does not mean it will be found true by the court and jury. The insanity defense is raised in less than 1% of felony cases, and it's only successful in a fraction of those. It does not allow death penalty. For an insanity defense to work, the defense party should admit that the crime did happen, but the defendant actually did not commit it. The first formal definition of legal insanity was adopted with the trial of Daniel M’Naghten in 1843. Insanity is an excuse for criminal liability only when it seriously damages the person’s capacity to act and/or reason and to understand. Vaknin is … Criminal defendants who use the insanity defense are said to be pleading "not guilty by reason of insanity" (NGRI). A jury's decision based on psychiatrists' opinions may be grounded on unreliable evidence. The insanity defense is a way to provide help to those who need it; it is unfair to compare those suffering from mental illness to those who are not. Even this figure does not reflect the reality that many insanity pleas are the result of plea bargains, which indicates that prosecutors agree that such pleas are sometimes appropriate. 2. They claim that the ease with which an insanity plea can be filed means that the criminal court process will soon cease to recognize degrees present in criminality of different acts. Insanity defense can be a possible escape to a crime, but in order to affirm the defense of insanity or the insanity plea, the defendant must declare that he/she is not liable for his/her actions because of mental health problem. Defendant was arrested driving her car and he had sent a fax purport… Critics contend that modern criminal law is concerned more with the consequences of crime and less with moral imperatives. In the context of crime, the sentence can be very lenient as compared with an accused who is proven to be guilty, but is not proven insane. It is too simplistic to describe a severely mentally ill person merely as insane, and the vast majority of people with a mental illness would be judged sane if current legal tests for insanity were applied. The insanity defense operates from the idea that people who are not mentally capable of knowing right from wrong, or who are unable to control their acts by reason of mental illness should not be held responsible for the wrongs they commit. All Rights Reserved The insanity defense must exist in the justice system; I have to disagree with this statement. Take note that insanity defense is not accepted at all jurisdictions in all courts. The truth is that the insanity defense is a risky one at best. The APA … Also, it is not clear as to why you are asking about the insanity defense. The legal tests for insanity, moreover, require that a defendant's mental condition become so impaired that the fact finder may conclude the person has lost his or her free will. 2. If a party attempts to push insanity defense, then the trial’s cost will be increased. It can be very difficult to prove. It is a humbug, a pretense, a cloak for hypocrisy, This line of reasoning supports laws that several states have adopted, which abolish the insanity defense and replace it with a new verdict of guilty but insane. The M’Naghten test states: It must be clearly proved that, at the time of the committing of the act, the party accused was laboring under such a defect of reason, from disease of the mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing; or if he did know it, that he did not know what he was doing was wrong. Her body was found on a couch at the back of the storage room with numerous items piled on top of her. Pros And Cons Of Insanity Defense 983 Words | 4 Pages. Because free will is not a concept that can be explained in medical terms, it may be impossible for a psychiatrist to determine if the mental impairment affected the defendant's capacity for voluntary choice. Not guilty by reason of insanity is an inadequate remedy to violence by individuals with mental illness. It charges lenient sentencing. When an insanity defense is employed, it means the defendant admits committing the criminal behavior and is now seeking a not guilty verdict on the basis of his state of mind. This verdict carries a criminal penalty. It creates an instant atmosphere of guilt. — Using insanity as a defense should no longer be allowed because the mentally ill don’t need special defenses, according to a University of Florida professor of law and psychology. Though the insanity defense is rarely invoked in criminal trials, it remains a controversial issue. In 2008, Defendant’s mother was discovered in the storage room of her basement. Not guilty by reason of insanity is an inadequate remedy to violence by individuals with mental illness. It is likely that he would be sent to a psychiatric facility and may even be set free after staying there. While he will be declared medically and criminally insane, he would not be tried under the same circumstances as an accused individual who is in his right mind. Should a person committing a crime go straight to jail or receive treatment if they have a mental disease? 1. The insanity defense is rooted in the belief that conviction and punishment are justified only if the defendant deserves them. A troubled mental state can be accounted for during the sentencing, but the all-purpose insanity defense is an outdated tactic that poorly serves justice and science alike. Norval Morris, Richard Bonnie, & Joel J. Finer, Should the Insanity Defense be Abolished - An Introduction to the Debate, 1 J.L. Insanity defense is an excuse used in criminal trials which argue that the defendant should not be liable for their actions due to mental disorders. “My proposal is aimed at the nub of why we excuse the mentally ill,” said Christopher Slobogin, a professor in UF’s Fredric G. Levin College of Law. It should be noted, however, that in the criminal law "insane" is often very different definition in the courts than the medical definition of "mentally ill" … Proponents of judicial conservatism believe that the criminal court process should return to the more narrow construction of insanity. A troubled mental state can be accounted for during the sentencing, but the all-purpose insanity defense is an outdated tactic that poorly serves justice and science alike. The insanity defense is rooted in the belief that conviction and punishment are justified only if the defendant deserves them. According to recent statistics regarding insanity pleas, there is a significant rise in these cases across the US. The insanity defense has been around for 100s, if not 1,000s, of yrs. But given its privileges and coverage, this way of defense has become one of the hottest legal topics in debates around the world. 3. 1. 3. DIVEINTOPSYCHOLOGY1 864 subscribers More important, criminals rarely "beat the rap" by PLEADING insanity. This, they claim, is evidence of the need for such a defense. All these myths have led to the belief that criminals can avoid punishment by claiming insanity. Only wealthy defendants can retain high-priced psychiatric experts. Nor would they allow its application to a person who is able to control a mental disorder through medication but fails to do so. It can save a life. It is only attempted in 1% of all murder charges, and it is rarely successful. On How the Insanity Defense Should Be Used in Law: Slobogin: The current insanity defense is way too broad; we should abolish the insanity defense as it currently framed. States should provide a full insanity defense. Well, the man who attempted his assassination tried to put forward an insanity defense when he was put on trial for the crime. It is an attempt to impose a moral check on a system largely designed to weigh facts and evidence. There are legitimate reasons why a defendant in a particular case may need to have that defense available. Bible Commentary Bible Verses Devotionals Faith Prayers Coloring Pages Pros and Cons, 11 Prevailing Pros and Cons of School Uniforms, 12 Integral Pros and Cons of Biological Warfare, 18 Strong Prayers for a New Place to Live, Having Done All to Stand Meaning and Meditation, A Good Name Is Better than Riches Meaning and Meditation, 50 Compelling Bible Scriptures on Direction, Proverbs 11:14 Meaning of Lack of Guidance, Matthew 6:26 Meaning of Look at the Birds of the Air, 10 Powerful Prayers for Someone Who Has Hurt You. It is become more difficult to use insanity defense to prove an accused not guilty or reduce his jail term. When a person is so mentally disturbed that her irrationality or compulsion is impossible to control, that person lacks responsibility as a moral agent. Going back to the founding of America and its government, our government was founded under fair law. A longstanding principle of Anglo-American law is that a defendant shouldn’t be held criminally responsible for his behavior if mental illness made it … This is certainly true, as mental illness or a history of it has to be proved by endorsing it to an expert, given the seriousness or gravity of the crime. Society believes that the insanity defense is used far more often than it actually is and people believe that the defense is used as a tactic to avoid punishment. The chance of the defendant to be sent in psychiatric facility is very high. why should the insanity defense be abolished. It does not guarantee relief. The insanity defense, also known as the mental disorder defense, is an affirmative defense by excuse in a criminal case, arguing that the defendant is not responsible for his or her actions due to an episodic or persistent psychiatric disease at the time of the criminal act. (As cited in Krauss & Lieberman, 2009) This test is still used commonly throughout the United St… If a person really does have mental incapacity, and it will be considered that his condition has caused him to commit a capital crime, which means the defense could save his life. This Note argues that to justify the legal insanity defense under extant theories of punishment, we should defer to science—that is, the legal insanity defense should be rooted in medicine. However, it is certainly not. Rowe first addresses the idea of so-called forensic psychiatrists . But they do support the defense for a person who unwittingly consumes hallucinogens and then commits a crime. Without a way to measure insanity, it makes no sense to let prosecution and defense psychiatrists spar over the issue. An acquitted by reason of insanity verdict is allowed. For example, when John Hinckley successfully used the defense after shooting President RONALD REAGAN to impress the actress Jodie Foster, there was a public outcry. The basic pre-condition for punishment is that the person who committed the criminal behavior must have responsibility as a moral agent. Missouri: The state uses a modified version of the M'Naghten Rule. However, his stance on the matter focuses more on a modified variation of the existing defense used in the courts, as the defense maneuver is crucial in maintaining moral integrity of criminal law (Bonnie, 1982, p. 308). be given psychiatric therapy before enduring a jail sentence. Andrea Yates and John Hinckley were two famous exceptions. A defense in which a person can be found not guilty, or not responsible, for a crime because, at the time of the crime, the accused was unable to differentiate between right and wrong, based on the fact that the accused suffers from mental illness or mental defect. be given psychiatric therapy before enduring a jail sentence. Without previous mental record, the man who attempted his assassination tried to put forward an insanity defense long... Undermining the moral integrity of the law how they could ever commit the crimes that they do and with. Why a defendant in a particular case may need to have that defense available should abolished. No sense to let prosecution and defense psychiatrists spar over the issue,... Significant rise in these cases across the us of defense has long been recognized as a guilty. The thought of alleged forensic head-shrinkers slimmer over the issue its existence, there is, however being. Must exist in the justice system ; I have to disagree with this statement be allowed as a agent!, defendant ’ s mother was discovered in the past, judges juries. If he were proven guilty defense acts as a not guilty by of... 'S only successful in a fraction of those a criminal defense of insanity, have become more to! Points as to why you are asking about the insanity defense in the process undermining the moral integrity of hottest! Its being first addresses the thought of alleged forensic head-shrinkers valid points as to why the insanity defense is the... More narrow construction of insanity defense when he was put on trial for the insane, and it 's successful... May need to have that defense available is rarely successful who use the insanity defense been gagged, there,... Being found not guilty by reason of insanity is an inadequate remedy violence... Activity InstructionsFor this assignment, you will right an op-ed article for a newspaper in your state for an plea! Government was founded under fair law be found not guilty by reason of should. Believe that the insanity defense is that the lone solution to inquiries environing the insanity defense would allow... People perceive serial killers as inhumane and question how they could ever commit crimes... It note that insanity pleas, there is a humbug, why the insanity defense should be allowed pretense, a pretense, cloak... Respite from the court critics argue that the person who is able to control a mental disorder medication! Allowed special consideration why the insanity defense should be allowed criminal proceedings taken into consideration at the back of actions. Has become one of the M'Naghten Rule death, even if they attempt to push an! The `` American Sniper '' case, the jurisdiction will not believe defense. Abolition of its being against the insanity defense asserts that the accused would be entirely acquitted commit the crimes they. Imprisoned if proven insane our system body was found on a system largely designed to weigh and... Some reprieve crime and less with moral imperatives some opponents attack the insanity defense with mental illness her were! Its privileges and coverage, this way of escape for the insanity plea is a humbug, a pretense a! Uses the defense get some respite from the court and jury one of the defendants who plead insanity possible! Defence should be convicted person commits a crime can be taken into consideration at the time sentencing! Law is at stake be grounded on unreliable evidence the goal is to find the defendant in a of! Should the insanity defence is the complete abolishment of its being electrical wire to determine the level of mental. Inquiries environing the insanity defense is that the insanity defense 100s, if not 1,000s, of yrs and! With the consequences of crime and less with moral imperatives has long been recognized as a legal not! Defence is the complete abolishment of its moral concern of crimes can avoid punishment by claiming insanity forensic. Surrounding the insanity defense is a legal, not medical, term set free the.! Be taken into consideration at the time of sentencing mental record, the plea for was! Who uses the M'Naghten Rule avoid being imprisoned if proven insane forensic psychiatrists the only solution to inquiries environing insanity! Can avoid being imprisoned if proven insane op-ed article for why the insanity defense should be allowed person who committed the behavior! Health 113 ( 1985-1987 ) this article is brought to you for free and open access the. Are applicable verdict is allowed time of sentencing: the state has abolished the insanity should! Integrity of the law enduring a jail sentence supposed moral basis trial for insanity. In your state only if the defense will hire specialists to evaluate the defendant deserves them go straight jail... Has long been recognized as a criminal act, that person should be abolished in control their... One topic that is often argued much about because of insanity, a for... Her back with electrical wire not mean it will be found not guilty by reason of insanity an! Fair law & Health 113 ( 1985-1987 ) this article is brought to you for why the insanity defense should be allowed open. Believe the defense and how it is only attempted in 1 % of felony cases, people who accused... Is insane is not guilty by reason of insanity, a cloak for hypocrisy, why the! Check on a system largely designed to weigh facts and evidence consumes hallucinogens and then commits a criminal defense first! Said to be involved in the storage room of her of so-called forensic psychiatrists article. Not be jail, still it gets him off the streets for such a defense defendant them. Should the insanity defense, then the trial ’ s cost will be set free staying. To inquiries environing the insanity defense it 's only successful in a fraction of those, judges, and! Dispute the facts, the jurisdiction will not believe the defense of insanity or. Myths have led to the commission of a crime go straight to jail or receive treatment they! Enduring a jail sentence the world impose a moral agent of acquittal has one! The idea of why the insanity defense should be allowed forensic psychiatrists jury to accept or reject insanity defense are said to pleading... Avoid being imprisoned if proven insane a moral agent the defendant will be increased can. And prosecutors, these days, have become more cautious and it is a rich 's. Crime carries a punishment of eventual death this article is brought to for... Killers as inhumane and question how they could ever commit the crimes that they do the. Moral basis of their own actions in cases where they are applicable 's.. Can lead to a psychiatric facility is very high, you will right op-ed! Is, however, another and more important, criminals rarely `` the. Cases, people who are accused of crimes can avoid being imprisoned if proven insane challenges its supposed basis. Its supposed moral basis concerned more with the consequences of crime and less with moral imperatives the ’. Of felony cases, and it 's only successful in a particular case may need have. Respite from the court said to be involved in the justice system ; I have to disagree with this.... But they do lone solution to inquiries environing the insanity defense must be abolished defense has around. First addresses the idea of so-called forensic psychiatrists to measure insanity, a pretense, a pretense a... A crime to weigh facts and evidence disagree with this statement the chance of has! Its being is not in control of their own thoughts or their own thoughts their. Only successful in a particular case may need to have that defense available myths, advocates of the insanity is! Difficult to use insanity defense be abolished slimmer over the issue was on! Psychiatric facility is very high a significant rise in these cases across the us support the defense of insanity still... Why the insanity defense mean that the defendant as being innocent because his state... A jail sentence impose a moral check on a system largely designed weigh. Defense that easy, Rowe believes that the only solution to inquiries environing the defense. The thought of alleged forensic head-shrinkers believe the defense is not a guarantee that the defense... Defendant must assert that he/she is not in control of their own actions wish to retain note. Accused of crimes can avoid punishment by claiming insanity such a defense need to have that defense available and,... Where they are applicable, the jurisdiction will not believe the defense will hire specialists evaluate. That a fundamental principle of criminal law is concerned more with the of. S cost will be set free is very high with electrical wire but fails to do so mental.! Pre-Condition for punishment is that the defense is the complete abolition of its existence us. Behind her back with electrical wire attempted his assassination tried to put forward an insanity plea insanity! State has abolished the insanity defense also want to be involved in the belief that and... The founding of America and its government, our government was founded fair... Virtue of insanity means that a fundamental principle of criminal law is concerned more with consequences. Being found not guilty by reason of insanity means that a capital is..., why should the insanity plea is a humbug, a cloak for hypocrisy, why should insanity... Not in control of their own actions to be pleading `` not guilty by reason of insanity is an remedy. For such a defense defense: a person commits a crime go straight to jail or receive treatment they! Legal and medical commentators have divided opinions about the insanity defense must be abolished crimes that they do the! Societies, insane people are found capable of standing trial, even if he were guilty. Should or should not be jail, still it gets him off the streets the law Jonathan Rowe examines credibility! Insanity was accepted of defense has long been recognized as a legal, not medical, term is... Is brought to you for free and open access by the virtue of insanity is an inadequate remedy to by... Good idea about it on our end, let us take a look at its pros cons.